Anti trust case of auo taiwan s lcd

The main idea of Fair Trade Act law is the same as antitrust law. Testimony from economists also took center stage. We can not jump to conclusion which law is better.

These finished products are then sold in the United States and around the world.

DOJ NETS HUGE FINES AND JAIL TERMS IN LCD PRICE FIXING CASE

The potential sentences that the AUO defendants face are noteworthy. Joint research and development on goods or markets for the purpose of upgrading technology, improving quality, reducing costs, or increasing efficiency; 3. The global anti-trust or anti-competitive litigation has evolved into a business competition.

Antitrust Division’s Pound Of Flesh: AU Optronics' Impact

Lessons Learned Challenging the DOJ as the lone targeted defendant in a massive criminal price fixing conspiracy where other coconspirators have pled or settled, then showing no remorse and little cooperation with DOJ prosecutors may be a risky strategy to pursue.

Samsung may be the better example here to follow, if it is possible. And once again, it goes back to my most important idea that I have learned in ethics class: In Taiwan, it is usual that managers have some sorts of meeting in order to gain some information from other competitors.

And once again, it goes back to my most important idea that I have learned in ethics class: In Taiwan, above behaviors are reasonable. AUO is the only one fighting on. It understands there is a forgiveness policy will benefits one who blow the whistle. In my points of view, antitrust law gives a wide range of cartel.

District Court Judge Susan Illston in San Francisco for participation in a criminal price fixing conspiracy in the market for thin-film transistor liquid crystal display LCD panels. In contrast to antitrust law, Fair Trade Act law does not provide incentive to blow the whistle.

Importantly, the testimony about gross gains in sales as a result of the alleged price-fixing described gains realized by all members of the conspiracy, not just AUO. Goods from Taiwan export to the United States and Europe region are increasing a lot.

Moreover, in the past two years, four LCD companies do not earn profit in their business because of bad economic situation. Over the course of the investigation, the Antitrust Division netted massive fines and lengthy jail terms for members of the alleged conspiracy.

However, it takes AUO lots of time to face the trial and lots of money to spend on the lawsuit. Also, it used information from competitors to undercut them, according to its defense, and increase its market share.

The defense, in contrast, presented expert testimony that focused on the gross gains realized only by AUO during the term of the alleged conspiracy.

Over the last decade, AUO has become one of Taiwan's largest companies.Anti-Trust Case of AUO, Taiwan's LCD Company Essay Anti - trust case of AUO (Taiwan's LCD company) Abstract Before China, Taiwan used to be a world-factory.

Taiwan’s technical companies always focus on improving their progress on product. InPeng helped establish AUO's Suzhou module plant, the Company's first overseas manufacturing facility as General Manager of the Suzhou site.

Having returned to Taiwan inPeng assumed AUO's sales and marketing function, where he was appointed General Manager of IT Display Business Group. The Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) scored an important victory on September 20, when AU Optronics Corp.

(AUO) of Taiwan was fined $, by U.S. District Court Judge Susan Illston in San Francisco for participation in a criminal price fixing conspiracy in the market for thin-film transistor liquid crystal display.

The consolidated case is U.S. v. AU Optronics Corp. et al., case numbers, andin the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. On July 10,the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals denied an appeal by AU Optronics Corp.

and two of its former executives to reverse a $ million criminal judgment for participating in a conspiracy to fix the prices of liquid crystal display (LCD) panels. WASHINGTON — AU Optronics Corporation, a Taiwan-based liquid crystal display (LCD) producer, was sentenced today in U.S.

District Court in San Francisco to pay a $ million criminal fine for its participation in a five-year conspiracy to fix the prices of thin-film transistor LCD panels sold worldwide, the Department of Justice announced.

Download
Anti trust case of auo taiwan s lcd
Rated 5/5 based on 100 review